Monday, May 8, 2023

The Tuesday Interview | ‘Go First is two years too late to be able to salvage its operations’

 

https://www.clarinetu.com/profile/wevov35724/profile
http://www.bluesoleil.com/forum/thread-2-169569-1.html
https://www.xroxy.com//xorum/viewtopic.php?t=228712
https://www.guildlaunch.com/guild/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12105030&gid=48
https://www.halaltrip.com/user/profile/121418/soniapalmer/
https://www.fbtb.net/author/martipearce/



Just as Indian aviation was all set for takeoff, the Wadia Group-owned firm Go First (previously known as GoAir) became India’s first domestic airline since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic to seek bankruptcy protection, stirring an industry-level crisis. In a conversation with DH’s Lavpreet Kaur, Union Minister of State for Civil Aviation, Road Transport, and Highways, General Vijay Kumar Singh (Retd), spoke on the challenges facing Indian aviation as it negotiates a booming demand and how the government could help.

What role does the government see for itself in the ongoing Go First crises, which put thousands of jobs at risk and also hurt passengers’ interests?

The problem with Go First is the Pratt and Whitney engines in their aircraft. The company is unable to manufacture the number of engines that have been required for the last two years. And if you want to change the engines, it will take time to get another type of engine. It will require reconfiguration and a lot of system changes. It’s a very complicated exercise. What kind of bailout can you give?

We are already breathing down the neck of Go Air (Go First). Well, the signs were visible to Go Air (Go First) two years ago. They should have started looking at it from that point on. They are two years too late. So the government will ensure that passengers don’t suffer. And for others who have invested in the airline, some answers will be found.

Now there are fears that the Indian aviation market is becoming an oligopoly and may even narrow down to a duopoly.

No… Akasa is doing fairly well. It is not dependent on Pratt & Whitney, but their only problem is that, as per their agreement, they are getting two planes every month, and it is supposed to go up only after a couple of months. Go Air (Go First) was anyway not doing much, except for a few flights where schedules were hampered. We hope that we will be able to get people who can start something (an airline), which will help improve efficiency. Those efforts are on. It will be too premature to say anything further.

You’ve acknowledged the need to hire FATA pilots and the significant number of unemployed CPL holders in the country. Is the government planning to do something about this?

There’s no shortage of pilots. The shortage is of commanders, and for that, airlines are getting people from abroad. Our people are yet to go up (to senior positions), and that will take time. The number of flight training organisations has gone up. But they’re all rookie pilots, and it will take time for them to get a job, acquire those many hours on a particular type of aircraft, and then get upgraded as per their skills.

Why has UDAN’s penetration been so limited?

Any airline that wants to fly from place A to place B for regional connectivity will be connected; there is an open bid. The airline has to do the study. I can’t force them. We don’t want to end up in a situation like Air India, where it could fly wherever you want, losses be damned. Now, UDAN airports will be made at the discretion of airlines willing to fly the routes and the viability of the routes.

UDAN’s penetration is limited because some of the initial entrants into the fray did not make a roadmap for the future. There are some who brought new aircraft that were much smaller than what was required and were not able to service them as they wanted to. So they folded up, saying, “We don’t want to fly this.” If you have a larger aircraft, you will have a problem with a lower passenger count. So it’s a very awkward problem.

Indian airlines have placed orders for around 1400 aircraft and are expecting to handle 350 million passengers by 2030. Can our infrastructure keep pace?

It is ready. If you look at the capacity increase that has taken place, we’re already catering for capacities that are required in 2030–2035, and we are looking ahead. We are not waiting. MRO has a strange issue, and that is how much the manufacturers are willing to invest. We are trying to force them through the airlines. If Akasa has to buy so much, if Air India has to buy so much, we are telling them you get the maintenance. We are willing to give them incentives so that it becomes easier for them to come and set up MRO.
 

ED chief Sanjay Mishra to demit office in November after FATF exercise: Centre to Supreme Court

 

https://artistecard.com/zanefrederick
https://www.infragistics.com/community/members/577203227e8310f6ca2a2da1d6b3b83291a7df20
https://www.zintro.com/profile/zi480387e2?ref=
https://www.doctorslounge.com/index.php/member/1624109
http://sophiadaisy.xobor.de/u1075_jeffballard.html
https://profile.hatena.ne.jp/kaseyduke/

The Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court that the chief of Enforcement Directorate, Sanjay Mishra, would demit office in November when the international watchdog Financial Action Task Force (FATF) would have substantially completed the exercise that has been under way to verify whether India has necessary mechanisms in place to check money laundering and financial terrorism.
Appearing for the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the SC Mishra’s tenure was extended to ensure the country fares well in the review process which is crucial and it is not the case that the officer is indispensable for the agency.

Amicus curiae and senior advocate K Vishwanathan argued that extensions and amendments were illegal which could be misused by successive governments.

The SG told a bench of Justices B R Gavai, Vikram Nath and Sanjay Karol that the review process is a lengthy one which continues for 18 months passing through different phases. He said though the FATF exercise is likely to be concluded only by June next year, substantial part of it would be over by November. He was responding to a batch of petitions, including the plea by Congress’ Randeep Surjewala and TMC's Mahua Mitra.
Mehta also reiterated Mishra’s tenure was extended to ensure the country fares well in the review process which is crucial and it is not the case that the officer is indispensable for the agency. “The assessed country must provide information on the laws, regulation and any other legal instruments it has in place to combat money laundering and financing of terrorism and proliferation. This used to be the main focus of FATF and it still requires the legal framework to be in place. But experience has shown that having the laws in the books is not enough, the main focus is now on effectiveness,” he said.

Amicus curiae and senior advocate K Vishwanathan submitted that piecemeal extensions of tenure by one year each, subject to a maximum cumulative tenure of five years, undermines the independence and integrity of the office of ED chief. "This may be misused by successive governments and the amendments would haunt the country," he said, pleading the court to keep in mind "larger interests of democracy" while deciding the case.
"The amendments are invalid and also the extensions," he said while summarising his arguments. He said CVC (Amendment) Act, 2021, DSPE (Amendment) Act, 2021, and Fundamental (Amendment) Rules, 2021 are violative of Article 14 for being discriminatory and/or manifestly arbitrary.
The bench after hearing all sides reserved its order on the petitions.

Post- 9/ 11 terror attack, FATF certifications have taken on enormous significance with countries like Pakistan falling afoul of the verification exercise to land on its list which leads to denial of funds and international opprobrium.
The bench said the government had earlier justified extension of Mishra on the ground that he was supervising probe in many important cases and asked Mehta whether it had raised the issue of FATF in 2021 when the apex court had ruled that Mishra should not be given more extension. The SG replied that the government had flagged that issue at that time as well.
The petitioners- Moitra and Surjewala--alleged that extensions were being given to Sanjay to make the agency toe the government's line and were, thus, influencing ED's investigation in several cases. They said the amendment gave unfettered discretion to the government to keep the ED director obliged by promising him extension, which was completely against the SC rulings in Vineet Narain and Common Cause cases where the apex court had secured a fixed tenure of two years to the director of CBI with the noble intention of insulating him from political interference. 

The Tuesday Interview | ‘Go First is two years too late to be able to salvage its operations’

  https://www.clarinetu.com/profile/wevov35724/profile http://www.bluesoleil.com/forum/thread-2-169569-1.html https://www.xroxy.com//xoru...